Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Scandium International Mining Corp T.SCY

Alternate Symbol(s):  SCYYF

Scandium International Mining Corp. is a mineral exploration and development company. The Company’s advanced project is the Nyngan Scandium Project, located in New South Wales, Australia (the Nyngan Scandium Project), on which it holds a mine lease grant, a development consent, and 100% of the mineral rights. The Nyngan Scandium Project site is located approximately 450 kilometers (km... see more

TSX:SCY - Post Discussion

Scandium International Mining Corp > New corporate presentation, August 24, 2021
View:
Post by AllDutch1234567 on Aug 30, 2021 5:18pm

New corporate presentation, August 24, 2021

I noticed some small textual changes (from what I recall). Does anyone have a copy of the previous version (July 2021) so we can compare these?
 
https://scandiummining.com/site/assets/files/3480/corporate_investor_presentation-_aug_24-_2021__final.pdf
 
Slide 9: Program will test and pilot a 2,500-5,000 TPY HPA production plant.
Are they now thinking of doubling the initial production capacity? What was in the previous version?
Comment by Zerosum on Aug 30, 2021 6:56pm
Getting rebuffed* might lead one to providing* more details* and fewer hypotheticals*   *indicates more risk through less certainty. *EBITDA cannot be based on to many *'s
Comment by Trekewl on Aug 31, 2021 1:01am
It was the same in the July version: a 2,500-5,000 TPY HPA production plant.
Comment by AllDutch1234567 on Aug 31, 2021 2:49am
Thanks Trekewl
Comment by AllDutch1234567 on Aug 31, 2021 2:59am
Hi Trekewl, I forgot to ask if you've noticed any differences that are worth sharing on this board? Thanks!
Comment by Trekewl on Sep 03, 2021 8:10pm
Hi AllDutch, The only change was on the Phoenix CMR project economics. The refinery development program cost specifically for SCY went from US$1.5M to US$2M. That is all. Cheers.
Comment by ScandiumPower on Aug 31, 2021 5:20am
These points are not new compared to the prevoius presentation version, and are already discussed here, but for me this is now clear where is the focus of SCY:  • SCY’s development focus centers on producing critical minerals needed for next-gen product components. – Everything in the SCY development portfolio has a product offer for batteries. • Harvesting critical metals from ...more  
Comment by AllDutch1234567 on Aug 31, 2021 11:32am
Yes, I think this is defenitely a winning strategy. Focus on CMR and HPA makes us winners! Did you know that the EBITDA margin (= profit margin) for S&P 500 companies in 2021 is about 22%.   https://csimarket.com/Industry/industry_Profitability_Ratios.php?sp5   SCY's EBITDA margin for CMR and HPA combined, is 71%. More than 3 times higher!!!!! https://stockhouse.com ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities