RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Happy drunk
Aim,
You do not need to see his trading account when his actions speak volumes. Bannings, censorship, manipulation etc etc. The evidence is all there. Many people here got banned for no reason other than Sculpin did not agree with them or simply could not hold his ground in a debate.
You mention "fair" comments and again this in my opinion also pertains to Sculpin integrity. He has on a variety occaisions indicated or suggested that Lori has been less then honest or worse with shareholders and has not provided and sound explanation or supporting evidence. Even if Lori where found guilty tomorrow yesterdays comment remains "unfair" because it was not presented fairly at the time. Now, I am obviously not a legal expert and I may be wrong but this is my interpretation.
As far as there "always" being a "pro" lori poster on SH one could say the exact same thing about the dissident shareholders so what is the big deal? We are all allowed to post. If a "pro" lori poster is "bad" how is a "pro" dissident poster any better. These double standards that posters have on these board are just insane.
If you want a pro dissident Lori hate board then you may want to read Agoracom where anything pro Lori is promptly deleted and the poster banned.
Perhaps someone can test that theory!
Anyway, thats all for now.