Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Standard Lithium Ltd T.SLI


Primary Symbol: V.SLI Alternate Symbol(s):  SLI

Standard Lithium Ltd. is a Canada-based near-commercial lithium development company. The Company is focused on the sustainable development of a portfolio of lithium-brine bearing properties in the United States. The Company's projects, the Phase 1A Project and the South West Arkansas Project, are located on the Smackover Formation in southern Arkansas, a region with a longstanding and established brine processing industry. The Company has also identified a number of highly prospective lithium brine project areas in the Smackover Formation in East Texas and began a brine leasing program in the key project areas. The Phase 1A Project is a brownfield project being developed in cooperation with LANXESS Corp. The South West Arkansas Project is a greenfield project located approximately 15 miles to the west of the LANXESS facilities. In addition, the Company also has an interest in certain mineral leases located in the Mojave Desert in San Bernardino County, California.


TSXV:SLI - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by beyondhelp69on May 05, 2013 2:15pm
117 Views
Post# 21340964

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: How They Get You In

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: How They Get You In

I don't think you are seeing the whole picture.  Originally, the white team chose three choices for the green team to pick one as an independent director.  The green team chose not to pick one because they did not trust the white team.  If the green team chose 3 choices for the white team to choose one for a fifth board member, the same result would occur.  The white team dose not trust the green team.  If however, the 3 choices from the white team and the three choices from the green team were put to the courts to pick one, no one would have an objection because it was an independent party that chose the fifth board member. 

Bullboard Posts