Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Standard Lithium Ltd T.SLI


Primary Symbol: V.SLI Alternate Symbol(s):  SLI

Standard Lithium Ltd. is a Canada-based near-commercial lithium development company. The Company is focused on the sustainable development of a portfolio of lithium-brine bearing properties in the United States. The Company's projects, the Phase 1A Project and the South West Arkansas Project, are located on the Smackover Formation in southern Arkansas, a region with a longstanding and established brine processing industry. The Company has also identified a number of highly prospective lithium brine project areas in the Smackover Formation in East Texas and began a brine leasing program in the key project areas. The Phase 1A Project is a brownfield project being developed in cooperation with LANXESS Corp. The South West Arkansas Project is a greenfield project located approximately 15 miles to the west of the LANXESS facilities. In addition, the Company also has an interest in certain mineral leases located in the Mojave Desert in San Bernardino County, California.


TSXV:SLI - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by The_Primed_Reporton Jun 09, 2013 5:00pm
52 Views
Post# 21504718

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Blame Game

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Blame Game

bTW dummy, 55% was the majority of the shares and does not nessesarily represent majority consensus. I doubt that you have majority shareholders... just majorty shares. Of corse all that matter is majrity shares so why can't you idiots stick with the facts and make a proper claim rather than trying to be manipulative. Furthermore, according to Slimer the dissidents dropped th petition to ovr turn the vote meaning that you fictional 91% or 55% looking at it properly is still a moot point and a waste to discuss. So... if they don;t want to over turn the vote why go to court... why raise money under false pretenses? Why all the manipulation. You better get BBB in here to start answering questions because he is the only one with half a brain on your side. Actually s of late his best argument is name calling so that won;t help either.

Bullboard Posts