Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Sir Royalty Income Fund T.SRV.UN

Alternate Symbol(s):  SIRZF

SIR Royalty Income Fund (the Fund) holds investment in SIR Corp (SIR). The Funds' investment, SIR is engaged in the business of owning and operating full-service restaurants in Canada. SIR has concept restaurant brands, including Jack Astor’s Bar and Grill, Scaddabush Italian Kitchen & Bar, and Canyon Creek Chop House, signature restaurant brands, such as Reds Wine Tavern, Reds Midtown Tavern, Reds Square One, and The Loose Moose, which are used by SIR under a license agreement with SIR Royalty Limited Partnership (the Partnership. The Fund receives distribution income from its investment in the Partnership and interest income from the SIR Loan. The Fund indirectly participates in the revenues generated under the License and Royalty Agreement through its Investment in the Partnership.


TSX:SRV.UN - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by logicandinertiaon Jun 20, 2018 9:13am
113 Views
Post# 28197450

RE:RE:What does the future hold for SIR - could be interesting

RE:RE:What does the future hold for SIR - could be interestingSir provides audited statements for both the Royalty and the Corporation (Corp).  In 2017, Ebitda for the CORP was about $19 million, while cash flow from operations (excluding the distributions paid to the Royalty), was $22.3 million (and $20 million in 2016).   So the Corp generates an ebitda margin of 7.6 percent .   The KEG was at 6.9 percent in 2017 and Cara was 6.8 percent.  The Keg was 54 percent franchised and Cara 82 percent, so this illustrates the strength of SIR CORP (generating more margin with no franchising).

 A buyer would be buying the CORP and then could also purchase the Royalty too and collapse this structure.  

Given that the Royalty pays out all its “earnings”, and the yield is 7.9 percent , the inverse is used to generate a rough earnings multiple.  1/0.079 Equals 12.6x “earnings”, quite reasonable.  

If one were a buyer, what steps could they take?   Franchising of one or more of the brands would pay immediate benefits in up front franchise fees and the ability to earn margin of supplies and the typical ongoing percentage paid on revenues.  There would be immediate cost savings on head office and public reporting costs too.

So there is no easy answer to your query.  These economics are not lost , however , on Mr Fowler and I’m sure that if the business is to be sold, it will be done so at a favourable price, given his vested interest and effort put into to building such a successful entity.   Hope this helps.
Bullboard Posts