Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Suncor Energy Inc. T.SU

Alternate Symbol(s):  SU

Suncor Energy Inc. is a Canada-based integrated energy company. The Company's segments include Oil Sands, Exploration and Production (E&P), and Refining and Marketing. Its operations include oil sands development, production and upgrading, offshore oil and gas production, petroleum refining in Canada and the United States and its Petro-Canada retail and wholesale distribution networks... see more

TSX:SU - Post Discussion

Suncor Energy Inc. > STUNNING: TMX Requires 4.4 Million Barrels Of LINEFILL
View:
Post by ztransforms173 on Jul 19, 2023 12:43pm

STUNNING: TMX Requires 4.4 Million Barrels Of LINEFILL

- WOW, what a DOWNER:

* TMX Pacific port (@ Burnaby Terminal) will ONLY ALLOW Aframax tankers {750,000 barrels) to dock and load crude oil for export

* this means that the VLCC carriers (2,000,000 barrels) will NOT BE PERMITTED to load crude oil at Burnaby Terminal

* these RESTRICTIONS impose an ECONOMIC PENALTY on crude oil exported to ASIA since the SHIPPING FEES per UNIT BARREL TRANSPORTED will be HIGHER for Aframax tankers versus VLCC carriers


New pipelines extend Canadian crude’s reach

A growing network of North American pipelines is helping more Canadian crude reach the international markets. And a new line from Canada will enable more shipments to reach a global market short of heavy sour crude.

Debottlenecking existing pipelines has given oil sands producers additional capacity to move their crude to the US and helped strengthen Canadian crude values. Canadian midstream firm Enbridge's Line 3 Replacement Project added 370,000 b/d to the 3.1mn b/d Mainline system from Canada to the US in late 2021. In the US midcontinent, Enbridge's 702,000 b/d Flanagan pipeline has more capacity to move crude further south following the use of drag-reducing agents. And the reversed 200,000 b/d Capline project now allows crude, including Canadian output, to flow from Illinois to Louisiana.

Discounts for Canadian heavy sour WCS in Alberta province have steadily narrowed to $10/bl to Nymex calendar-month average WTI from $30/bl nine months ago following the capacity additions. Increased demand from Cenovus' 150,800 b/d Toledo and 38,000 b/d Superior refineries — which were off line until this spring — has provided a further fillip to WCS values.

Canadian crude has received further support from the expectation that more crude will move west when the federally owned 590,000 b/d Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) from Edmonton, Alberta, to Burnaby, British Columbia, comes on stream. TMX is expected to be on line in the first quarter of 2024 after delays and regulatory issues that caused costs to swell.

The TMX pipeline is poised to give oil sands operators sufficient export capacity after a number of years of constraints that resulted in space along export lines being rationed. The option of being able to supply the domestic market but also export meaningful amounts of crude to the US west coast — and ultimately target Asia-Pacific destinations — is invaluable for companies considering capital plans in northeast Alberta.

Much of the crude shipped on the new pipeline may be exported mainly to North America in the near term, given its proximity. Californian refiners could increase their intake after importing 82,000 b/d of Canadian crude in June, according to the EIA, the most on record in data going back to 2009. Around 94pc of this total was heavy crude. Californian refiners could turn to Canadian grades such as Cold Lake Blend at the expense of heavy sour streams currently imported from Colombia, Ecuador or Mexico.

Trans-Pacific options

Restrictions on the size of tankers that can load at the TMX terminus could curtail exports to Asia-Pacific. The largest vessel allowed at the marine terminal is an Aframax, with about 750,000 bl of capacity. Such deliveries may look less competitive than shipments of up to 2mn bl on very large crude carriers from the better-equipped exporting region of the US Gulf coast.

Trans-Pacific shipments of heavy sour Canadian crude could also look less appealing compared with cheaper Russian supplies that have been diverted to India and China, following EU sanctions on Russian seaborne crude imports that took effect in December last year.

But Canadian crude shipments could still help offset tightness in the global sour crude market, given current production reductions by Opec+ heavyweights Saudi Arabia and Russia.

Linefill for TMX, amounting to 4.4mn bl, is likely to be required in the fourth quarter of this year, drawing down local inventories. The line will help reduce price shocks that were a hallmark of the Canadian market.

Comment by ztransforms173 on Jul 19, 2023 1:34pm
CORRECTION: - the actual Pacific port is the WESTBRIDGE MARINE TERMINAL and NOT the Burnaby Terminal - the new EXPANDED terminal dock complex will be able TO LOAD THREE AFRAMAX tankers AT THE SAME TIME from one before expansion z173
Comment by ztransforms173 on Jul 19, 2023 1:46pm
https://canadiansailings.ca/wp-content/images/2021/03/Screen-Shot-2021-03-25-at-11.35.12-AM-980x652.png https://canadiansailings.ca/pipeline-marine-terminal-making-progress/ z173
Comment by Experienced on Jul 19, 2023 8:16pm
Couple of thoughts zt.... 1..not surprising since the really big ships require specialized loading facilties.  Hence the the recentr purchases by Canadian companies of the port faciltiies in Texas at Corpus Christi. 2...more importantly, part of the thinking for TMX was that it would give Alberta producers access to Brent prices as opposed to to WTI and associated price discounst.   ...more  
Comment by meritmat on Jul 20, 2023 12:10am
Think you mean Brent instead of Canadian Select 
Comment by Oldnagger on Jul 20, 2023 6:23am
Irrespective of the netbacks on the TMPL expansion project , it is good to know that Canadian producers will be further freed from the tyranny of the Americans. Now if we could only find a way to free ourselves from the tyranny of some Canadian governments Let no one forget all the inflictions  that investors in Canadian petroleum had to go through over the past decade and even longer .Anyone ...more  
Comment by Experienced on Jul 20, 2023 6:44am
NEP? Wasn't there another Trudeau involved in that?.......lol Sadly, IMO, as bad as what the NEP was, what is going on now is not only much worse for the oil industry but more importantly much worse for Canada!!! As for TMX, I'm not sure that it really liberates Canada from the tyranny of the Americans since the class of ships that will transport the oil are only really good for ...more  
Comment by Oldnagger on Jul 20, 2023 9:21am
I don't know how shipping costs compare these days, however anything has to be better than the huge discounts that have been placed on Canadian crude in the past. My point is that it seems our Federal government has been aligned in an unholy alliance with the Americans for decades now to ensure that Western Canadian producers received far less than their due !!
Comment by Experienced on Jul 20, 2023 9:36am
Well it will be interesting to see how this works out. From what I have read, the tankers being allowed at the BC port are too small to make it economic for western oil producers to ship to Asia and get the brent price. The combination of the high tolls due to the cost overruns on TMX combined with the sea shipping costs will have to be compared to the current discount off WTI for WCS and other ...more  
Comment by MigraineCall on Jul 20, 2023 11:15am
Shipping on smaller tankers is really not such a big deal as it is made out to be. Recently, until a few months ago on November of 2022, Aframax tanker rates were less than VLCCs. Shipping rates change a lot, and it is hard to make valid long term predictions about the future shipping cost differences due to the volatility of the shipping market, and changing regulation. The only thing missing ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities