RE:RE:S7: 3 vs normal 6 months extension for WarrantsS7: Eloquently stated on your part, thank you!
Yes, we agree that when it's your money, you take responsibility for it. All the opinions and information (even, at times, that written; think BRE-X) in the world mean nothing. They don't have skin in the game like you and I do!
When I first saw the news of the extension for three months, I thought it was a misprint and decided to clarify that it wasn't the traditional six months.
Sernova has typically been very careful and low key on pretty well everything. That 3 Months News was anything but low key. To me, once clarified, it was a clear, very positive signal to all.
Like I researched and posted many times, there's little to no correlation of share price with news until, at some point, there is. As has been posted by some, Trillium (TRIL) is an excellent example. For Sernova, we wait for our turn like we have for seemingly an interminable amount of time.
When I start to doubt, even no, I keep thinking "World First and World Class". Sernova has the science, which is unbelievable for such a tiny company. Just maybe, that is part of the puzzle, Big Pharma can't understand how Sernova with so few employees can achieve so much whereas Big Pharma could not. They keep turning over rocks to make sure it is the real deal, i.e. they still have doubts even though the information is smacking them squarely between the eyes.
I hope you are well rewarded for your patience S7, which applies to all long suffering shareholders.
Cheers from Cowtown,
jwall