RE:RE:RE:Financial Results to be Released Feb. 25.Emailed the below to her.
what Leah should be doing is using the fat fee they just paid to the 3 banks to make them ask important leading questions they want to discuss and have on the transcript. She needs to ask each of them to ask 1 or 2 specific questions so they can elaborate and turn this into something useful. This is, by the way, done all the time and perfectly acceptable. If I were her I would make Mackie ask something like, explain the Phase 1 timeline expectations, clarify the data in P1 that could immediately go to P2, what is the importance of targeting a scavenger receptor vs. non-scavenger, etc... then have NBF dig in to NASH protocol, timing, abilit6 to harmonize, why they think there's such a value discrepancy between them and others, they keep talk8ng about incorporating the latest NASH info, what specifically is that, etc... If she doesn't do this they will be missing a chance to educate investors as they want, Thise transcripts are printed and published. This is your once a quarter chance to elucidate and add depth to your discussions. Two softball questions from sleepy analysts should embarrass them. Get your moneies worth from thos fat fees you just paid put and turn this from something embarrassing to something useful.
[/quote]