Theratechnologies Inc T.TH

Anyone want to guess at RBC's new target price?

[SPCEO1]

I will guess $1.65.

Of course it will also be interesting to see what changes, if any, Mackie, Canaccord and NBF make too.

[LowtoHigh]

So glad I got out today with some (albeit alot smaller) profit . But I think this will be a good rebound stock after it dips a bit more this week to find it's new floor. I dont see this going below $3.

[Jasonthehumble]

Since the majority of us are retail investors, we should all ban together and vote against everything the board and management recommends the next quarterly earnings. They need to see who really is in charge and my hope is that they see how disgruntled we all are.

[Wino115]

SPCEO, you think your avowed disinterest in being "activist" was something they took advantage of -- completely ignoring your logic and your past discussions and warnings?  They may have known you wouldn't really do anything from past behavior.  It's certainly a smack in the face from them though.   Maybe it will be time for us to be more forceful at the meeting

[Wino115]

At a minimum, they should have brought you in under the NDA and offered you the equivalent ownership to avoid dilution. Not even giving you an NDA is a snub as a 30% holder in my book. 

[SPCEO1]

We are not 30% holders and we lost some accounts this past year which slightly reduced our holdings from the 6.8 million shares we held at the end of 2019. But I know I could probably account for 20% with about 5 or 6 phone calls and getting to 30%, at least pre-offering, would not require a ton of work.  

[Sqidmandon]

These guys lied to our faces....I couldnt be more pissed off right now.  Wasted 5 years with these guys.  I gave them the benefit of the doubt that they had a whale on board, but now nothing.  Can't wait to take my losses and get out...right now $10 seems like a pipe dream, and who cares? google has increased 10x in 10 years....my mindmed investment is up 300% in 3 months...i

[scarlet1967]

If you can get 30% plus some 30% shareholders on this board even the total will be reduced due to dilution as well engaged shareholders we should be able to make our voice heard, nobody here wants to wait another minute not to mention months or years of being neglected as a royal shareholder.

[Jasonthehumble]

How about we reduce compensation to board members to save on cost? How about we make SPEO, a board member and give him no compensation. At least he would do what is best for the company and be more transparent.

[SPCEO1]

That is kind of you to say but I have no interest in serving on the board. But I am perplexed that the board would have agreed to go ahead with such an awful deal. 

[SPCEO1]

When it comes to votinig on board members and other items before the annual meeting, every shareholder has to make up their own mind as to how they will vote. In a recent post, someone suggested voting against everything the company brings up - that would not be wise as most of what shareholders vote on is not controversial. It is also rare that shareholders have a chance to vote on a broad

[Wino115]

Of course he will.  But this is the problem, we have been 100% correct to state that if they have value-enhancing developments about to launch they need to use these to become a more serious player in the serious institutionally-oriented investment community, especially in the US. We all know they have to execute first, but they also have to build a community of serious biotech investors that

[scarlet1967]

The conservative board with a little appetite for taking risks is the reason for a rushed deal . It's done can't be on done! Let's push the company to up their game and convert those new shareholders to investors and this is so far where the company has not been great at so they really need address it and fix it.

[ggg088]

In my understanding, @2.75 is the cost for the institutional investor, they must have done a comprehensive research about the THTX mangement team, operation,finance and R&D, they will have further understanding than retailer investors, because they ave more resources and want to make profit . So why this deal is a negative news? From the long term trend, the sp would be going up because more

[SPCEO1]

There may be some truth to that line of thinking and it is what the company is selling but count me  skeptical based on 40+ years of experience. Obviously, I hope you and the company are right about that. If new institutional holders compel US analysts to pick up coverage fo the stock, that will be a nice benefit from the deal. But the cost is way too high and other lesser NASH firms have

[scarlet1967]

SPCEO, you and your firm have a large holing and rest assure you will be backed by at least one large investor on this board I would guess probably more. So if think their IR having wrong approach why not let the company know backed by many long term investors? If you and rest of us don't agree with their current strategy why wouldn't you bring it to their attention? If I recal this board