Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Theratechnologies Inc T.TH

Alternate Symbol(s):  THTX

Theratechnologies Inc. is a Canada-based clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. The Company is focused on the development and commercialization of therapies addressing unmet medical needs. It markets prescription products for people with human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) in the United States. The Company's research pipeline focuses on specialized therapies addressing unmet medical needs... see more

TSX:TH - Post Discussion

Theratechnologies Inc > Possible Wed turbulence in pharma
View:
Post by Wino115 on Mar 30, 2021 9:23am

Possible Wed turbulence in pharma

You'll recall SPCEO told us the biotech/pharma index is down 30% from it's top on drug price concerns.  Just a note in case you are trading the stock, Wed may be when the House bill slips in drug price regulation and creates a bit of volatility.  Here's a quick thought from an analyst. We know THTX and their drugs won't be affected much at all, but industry correlation may impact the stock temporarily. It all has to do with your drug being large, globally sold, and lots of use by Medicare patients. Looks like they are only targeting top 50 or so drugs in the first years if it gets passed.

-----------------
"As a reminder, H.R.3 from the 116th Congress, sought to establish multiple programs to address drug prices and healthcare coverage, although clearly the most significant aspect would have been allowing HHS to negotiate prices for single-source drugs (prioritized by spending) under Medicare Part B and D via a reference-pricing mechanism (no more than 120% of the average price across Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, UK). Beyond that, the bill sought to cap the pace of price increases, institute an Out of Pocket Cap for Medicare beneficiaries, and provide for dental, vision, and hearing coverage as well.
 
·      Timeline for Implementation? The 2019 bill called for implementation to begin in FY23, with the negotiations initially limited to 25 drugs, then 50 in FY24. We will be interested if the Administration adjusts timelines, or if there is a later start (given that ~16 months have passed since H.R.3 was passed). Theoretically, if we are talking about a potential 2025 implementation, then the mix of drugs impacted shifts. Yes, drugs like Eliqiuis and Enbrel with longer-dated LOEs would still be impacted, but Humira, Revlimid, Eylea, Prolia/Xgeva are all expected to face generic/biosimilar competitors over 2023-early 2025 timeframe.
 
Impact to Our Coverage Universe. Given the points we outlined above, we would argue that nuance matters significantly here – particularly after years of waves of drug pricing concern. That said, we also acknowledge that that nuance may not matter on day 1 and that investors had increasingly discounted drug pricing risk in recent months. In terms of most direct impacts from an H.R.3-type effort, we would bucket them into categories (1) anti-PD-1s (i.e., Bristol’s Opdivo, Merck’s Keytruda – particularly given concentration risk with the latter), and (2) older products with pronounced US/OUS pricing differentials and later-decade LOEs (Amgen’s Enbrel, Bristol’s Eliquis, Pfizer’s Ibrance). From a stock-perspective, we would expect AMGN, BMY, and MRK to be most impacted if these efforts came to pass.
 
Biopharma Estimated Exposure to Medicare (as % of Net U.S. Sales)
download image
Comment by scarlet1967 on Mar 30, 2021 10:55am
One would have thought after the covid19 pandemic the US government would would try to fund their infrastructure bills elsewhere rather than going after biotech who spend billions to fund drug development. Looking at the article below it doesn’t look they the proposed reform will have a realistic chance to pass   “But the bill is fiercely opposed by Republicans and the powerful ...more  
Comment by Wino115 on Mar 30, 2021 11:26am
I would tend to agree it's a longshot. But it's clever politics as you know the Republicans will demand to find funding for a $3bil infrastructure bill, and they'll want the porkbelly programs to show folks back home they got new infrastructure. Lowering the cost of the Medicare program achieves that --better looking budget/funding, less of a tax hike, programs back home to dole out ...more  
Comment by SPCEO1 on Mar 30, 2021 11:36am
While talk of drug pricing controls will always be with us, I really do not see anything meaningful happening anytime soon. There is plenty of other, easier to pass thrugh the Senate, legislation that should keep DC occupied for a while. Now, there will always be talk about drug pricing and that may hurt the drug stocks from time to time, but I don't see there being any meaningful action that ...more  
Comment by scarlet1967 on Mar 30, 2021 12:14pm
“The argument is that the pharmaceutical companies have performed well in getting a vaccine into arms within a year, and need to be able to have the incentive of making money out of this innovation in years to come.”   Covid-19: World leaders call for international pandemic treaty https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56572775
Comment by jeffm34 on Mar 30, 2021 12:22pm
A decrease in revenue for big pharma will lead to increased consolidation in the industry. Companies will look to replace lost revenue through acquisitions. 
Comment by scarlet1967 on Mar 31, 2021 2:36pm
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ikebrannon/2021/03/30/maybe-we-arent-paying-too-much-for-drugs/?sh=36c0bd3e29c0
Comment by SPCEO1 on Mar 31, 2021 3:21pm
Early in this article, the author mentions that HIV will soon be cured. I suspect that is more aspirational than rational, but one never knows as science can sometims ake big advances very quickly. But it got me to thinking. What if tomorrow, a cure for HIV was found? What owuld be the implications for TH's share price? Not all that long ago, it would have been the end of the road for TH. But ...more  
Comment by scarlet1967 on Mar 31, 2021 3:47pm
"Chief Share Price Marketing Officer" I suspect  you were joking but I really think this is a full time job, who ever in charge of it needs constantly to keep an eye of the market sentiment, not that much who investor communities are but what they want to hear, what's their questions etc what the competition is doing, politics, new technologies, correcting analysts.... I hope ...more  
Comment by Wino115 on Mar 31, 2021 3:51pm
Sorry, that CSPMO position is already filled with a pro bono fellow.......Scarlet!
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse