Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. T.TRQ

Stop Crying!!!!!!

[Malpeque2]

You all have more time to vote NO now!!

You all have more time to DISSENT now just like the two institutionals.

The only issue I see in the "grey" area is can you vote ABSTAIN and still get dissenters rights like the two?

Is this a big issue in corporate law?

I don't think the company needs to send out new proxies to eveyone and delay more.     The recent Press Release does  provide adequete "notice" of any changes to the deal,  does it not?  

ALL the shareholder still have Dissenter's right and a course of action to follow.    I don't think court is a much different venue for stockholders verses binding arbitration........the only change I see to this is that court developments might be "public" as to results,  and this arbitration is agreed to be confidential.

[Sooner]

Hilarious---the 2 shareholders are doing a better job in getting fair value for minority shareholders than the TRQ BOD did and you think minority shareholders are crying. yeah - and I suppose you think Rio did a great job on this m&a effort as well.... any objective person looks at this for what it is...a circus with off the cuff decisions being made...

[Countrygent]

No crying here - just recognition that fundamental securities regulation laws and corporate law run counte to this sketchy scheme cooked up by Rio to save a failing bid for my shares. The dissent remedy has costs for individual shareholders which immediately creates an uneven playing field.  A little shareholder with a few thousand dollars in TRQ has the same transactional costs of filing

[Skip57]

As I have previously stated, I am a beneficial shareholder since my shares are held by RBC Direct Investing.  Those of you who use a discount broker as opposed to a full service broker are in the same boat.  You cannot file a Notice of Dissent until the shares are in your name.  This means you must move your account(s).  If your shares are in a registered account, such as an