Post by
DamnYankees on Nov 19, 2015 4:35pm
The Majority of Urologists Supported a Yes Vote
As mentioned earlier, 6 of the 9 Urologists in the meeting, including O'Donnel and Kamat, supported the regulatory approval of MCNA. The 7th could have been swayed in a restricted approval, and the balance of the committee, none of whom were Urologists, rejected the logic of those in the frontline battle against BC and voted no. Something about that doesn't sit well. This certainly has the characteristics of a skewed and pre determined show trial.
Comment by
txbioinv on Nov 20, 2015 10:06am
The COO replied and specifically said 'that all but one of the practicing urologists on the panel voted in favor of MCNA'..........I will try and post my email and the TST reply regarding the FDA letter/online petition. ............GL
Comment by
txbioinv on Nov 20, 2015 10:47am
Yes, I agree 100% with you; I was just stating what the Donald said. I too thought it was only 6 of 9 or 4of 6 practicing docs that voted. I will quote an old dear friend/ex boss of mine(his father was Frank Leahy - arguably greatest ND IRISH football coach all time), "This was no better than a goat f*#*cking at the local county fair". ............
Comment by
txbioinv on Nov 20, 2015 10:53am
LOL........correction: "This was no better than a goat f*cking contest, at the local county fair"............