TELESTA THERAPEUTICS INC T.TST

Email from TST management - November 19

[cndexpatman]

Well at least they responded, even if it's a boiler plate repsonse.

Agreed that the next "PR" and communication from management will dictate how February will likely go down.

-----------------------------------------
Dear XXXX,

Thanks for writing. As you can imagine, we are receiving a lot of queries from shareholders on the meaning of the outcome of the AdComm.

As Telesta is a public listed company, I can only share with you information that is in the public domain.

In terms of general comments:

• While we are disappointed in the results of the Advisory Committee, their views are just one of the elements that the FDA takes into consideration in their approval decision.
• All but one of the practicing urologists on the panel voted Yes.
• Our PDUFA date remains February 27, 2015
• Telesta's management team, professional advisors and partners will be working very hard and diligently over the next 3 months to maximize our potential for a positive FDA decision.

Best regards,

Don

Donald Olds, M.Sc., MBA

Chief Operating Officer
Chef de l’exploitation
Telesta Therapeutics Inc.


275 avenue Labrosse
Pointe-Claire, QC
H9R 1A3
T: 514.394.7921

From: XXXX
Date: Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 11:50 AM
To: Don Olds <[e-mail]>
Subject: FDA Advisory Committee Vote

Hello Donald,

As a long time shareholder I have not reached out in the past however I am curious to know what your management team is planning in terms of ensuring, that despite the negative outcome yesterday, the potential approval by the FDA in early 2016 is given the maximum chance of success. I realize the precedent of a no vote by the FDA Advisory Committee doesn’t bode well traditionally in getting FDA approval.

Any information or insights you can share with me when your schedule allows would be appreciated.

Regards,

XXXX

[barneyj44]

Thanks for sharing 

[ragingbull1327]

Why would shareholders be inundating Donald Olds?    Wtf is wrong with you people?   You're ACTUALLY nervous of the outcome???   Wtf man.   If this is all true, and people are really this confused, then our species is phuccccking beat

[ragingbull1327]

Worst Case Scenario: decision is no..... ME:   I lose some OPM.   Lots of OPM FDA:    Look like incompetent retards, who fail people tbeir risk is way higher.   They have much more on the line.....

[ragingbull1327]

In fact, the worst I can do is simply shift my OPM into some other poor b-tards hands.  lol

[txbioinv]

STFU..........mind your own faaacking business rgbullschiiit. We all as shareholders own a piece of the action........................so please stfu.

[ragingbull1327]

How can they be DISAPPOINTED???   The decision and meeting were meaningless.   I wouldn't care EITHER WAY about meaningless.   I'd tell them it was meaningless when I left the meeting with them, and I'd tell them if they don't have an answer already and have to run THIS ADCOMM TV SHOW within 3 months of PDUFA, that it best be a yes or they should have shut this for

[ragingbull1327]

When this is all over, I'm def writing a book about this.     lol

[DamnYankees]

Translation, let us get our 10 million options at 18 cent out of the way at Xmas and we'll update you in mid January. 

[thathurt]

expat, seems you got the very professional brush off (i could say you were told to go f yourself but won't)..to bad we didn't have a more professional AdCom with Olds there handing out strong messages then..in which case you wouldn't have had to email as you did.. ...ps while Olds can only respond in certain ways, again to criticize failed messaging by TST during this crisis, i note

[DamnYankees]

Hurt,Options  - millions of them. What is another 5 or 6 weeks of rampant uncertainty  for retailers in the big scheme of things. Words have a way of comforting people so focus on the word "Options" and think millions of them. As many have stated previously, this management team should be rewarded for getting us to where they have. "Options" .  Besides if the

[DamnYankees]

Hurt, To your point that a prognosticator suggested that the FDA will assign Adcomm spots that will vote as they desire, I have some thoughts on how this may have transpired in Telesta's case; If the FDA desired a NO, wouldn't the majority or all or "practicing urologists" voted NO making the ulimate denial irrevocable and beyond the bounds of appeal? They voted Yes. Those who