no disagreementwell, if it helps, guys, I guess you re all kinda "right". Its the difference between reserves and resources. Trevali will have to do some more exploration in Peru and Burkina Faso in the next months/years. So on the one hand they bring costs down, on the other hand they ll have to spend more in capex. I therefore do not calculate with AISC of 0.90 for the coming year, but maybe 1 USD/lb. Counting in lower Treatment Charges this might be a little pessimistic, but I prefer to be pessimistic/realistic. Things would look different if TV gets an investor motivated to finance the restructuring of RP2. Then costs in RP (Rosh Pinah) would get down to 0.65 and average costs for all mines would go down significantly with it. But thats just possibilities. For the moment, as I said, you are all right: TV needs zinc prices over 1.10 to be profitable this year and probably prices of about 1.05 to be profitable in 2021 including the higher investments on capex that are definitely needed. Means: upside potential stays where it is. Downside danger stays where it is as well (maybe a little better). If you think zinc prices stay where they are or rise more, than TV is a good investment. If not: you better sell any zinc producer anyway.