Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Ursa Major Minerals Incorporated T.UMJ



TSX:UMJ - Post by User

Comment by victor2009on Mar 07, 2011 11:42am
240 Views
Post# 18244388

RE: Anyone else notice this?

RE: Anyone else notice this?KerBer,

I referred to that Press Release in the "fifth round" coverage. The thing that caught my eye was that Randy Miller had been named as contact on the previous press releases I noticed. On the one you refer to, Ian Stewart was the man. Maybe the Randy Man had enjoyed enough embarrassment for a while, and wanted his right hand man to get his fair share.

It may be a sign that this strategy has been moved down the list of priorities, and is now assigned to more junior personnel. With Miller, we had a $30,000 per month [plus expenses, car and office allowance] man dedicated to making management look inept. With the move to Ian, they can look foolish at a much lower cost. It is also very comforting to the shareholders to know that it isn't the high price guy running around chasing his tail - he's again resting up, to be ready to take on the big projects, if one ever comes along.

As for ISM reaffirming what they are going to do - don't take that too seriously. They have a long history of announcing planned activities, but a very short list of executing the announced plans. They have been committed for about four years to getting a dewatering permit required for deeper exploration of one of their prospects, three years to releasing a full economic study on their Langmuir property, about that long to dealing with First Nations issues, and coming up a year since they planned to spin-out their main asset - Langmuir, etc. etc. To ISM "commitment" does not in any way indicate urgency or priority - it's more of a long term idea of something that makes them look like they're doing something that might get done tomorrow - and "tomorrow" never comes. In a way, procrastination is not always negative. If you are not capable of developing a cogent strategy, it is not a bad idea to delay proceeding with some of the half-baked ideas you do develop. Unfortunately there has been a time cost to this confusing inaction, as the one commitment that ISM has never missed is payroll and and "Investors Relations" contracts, as well as options granting to those involved.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>