RE:RE:RE:No one has posted a link This does not count as an article. This is an un-neuanced oversimplified soundbite posted on an inflammatory and superficial blog. Credibility zero. As stated by earlier posters the FDA has nothing to do with this. The FCC does. It is after-all the food and drug administration. Pat Scan is nether a food or a drug. Our product is regulated like WIFI and cell signals. This is the purview of the FCC who does consider human health effects. If approved it falls within acceptable limits. Even more assuring is we have achieved European certification. The EU has much better protections for human health. To be fair the US and Canada are pushovers on these issues. The EU typically is not.
On the second point in this blog post about legality. It is important to appreciate the difference between the public and the private domain. Because this tec does not take images of a person nor does it image their body there are no privacy issues. Additionally, by entering the casino patrons are by default forgoing their privacy in an implied or explicit manner depending on the circumstance . It is not insignificant that every move a patron makes outside of their room and the bathrooms is on video in Vegas. This blog post is a totally frivolous distraction.