Some good points Plisk - But Disagree on others There has been no leadership development whatsoever , show me new hires and show me those that have been promoted ? You can't.
On Peter yes he does belong with the company, it suits him, and its also the longest he has held down a position in.
Sadly the stroy is far from unique, nor is it striking or compelling, the rebrand is a pig with lipstick, its still a pig.
The business plan as you have spotted contradicting, why is that and who does that ? The incompitent !
This reach out of schools and again you make a valid point , why exclude earning potential ? This begs the question of , is he full of BS yet again ?
On inflection point, the guy spits out words and does not comprehend their meaning.
This stock isn't undervalued on those repeated numbers its 0.45 above where in should be.
Your opinion makes this company RIPE for a buyout at a dirt cheap price, are you kidding ? This is worth 5X sales on a good day, nothing more as it has ZERO IP , because another company builds the tech and what that tech does is nothing special at all !