Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Xtract One Technologies Inc. T.XTRA

Alternate Symbol(s):  T.XTRA.WT | XTRAF

Xtract One Technologies Inc. is a technology-driven threat detection and security solution company leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) to provide secure patron access control experiences. The Company is engaged in the development and commercialization of an integrated, layered, AI-powered threat detection gateway solution. It operates in two segments: Platform and Xtract segment. The... see more

TSX:XTRA - Post Discussion

Xtract One Technologies Inc. > Non-dilutive funding from RAYTHEON
View:
Post by vezmic1 on Feb 07, 2022 8:37am

Non-dilutive funding from RAYTHEON

It's very true and well known tha Raytheon did give PAT 2mil (USD) in non-dilutive funding (so far), its important to not forget that.  And that was WAY before the independent 3rd party findings that placed PAT at the Top-of-the-Field.

...and before PAT got selected to protect the US Federal Government's own Office of the Inspector General! - probably a coincidence.

I wonder if there might be more non-dilutive funding comming down the pipe?  Especially if RAYTHEON decides to make use of its... close... confortable.. 'relationship'... with the US government.  

...then again ...two mill is nothing for a WHALE like RAYTHEON.  They probably spend more on pancake breakfasts' for the staff.
Comment by mrpancake on Feb 07, 2022 9:11am
"And that was WAY before the independent 3rd party findings that placed PAT at the Top-of-the-Field."     If that were true, Patriot One would be selling millions of dollars of PATSCAN product. Why continue to refer to the MSG product as a more or less pet project. In other words if the product is so spectacular why write this in the shelf prospectus “the Company ...more  
Comment by AndyKruth on Feb 07, 2022 9:38am
But wasn't that also because of a demand from Canadian goverment that Raytheon had to "give" money to another company to get the oroginal order?
Comment by Jahpatriot on Feb 07, 2022 6:00pm
@AndyKruth: Andy, that maybe true but the fact is that they chose Pat over many other companies. They chose to give their money to a company that is aligned with them technologically and has an actual product/s that works.
Comment by beastcoastOG on Feb 08, 2022 10:40am
Jah  They don't pick and choose. Do you honestly believe that they go out of their way to give to Salmon farms and Shrimp companies in Saudi ?  Tell me smart asss , WTF has bubba gump shrimp Co got to do with Technology ? Yeah, exactly !
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities