RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: ReReReRe ecl61 PostsWow, man.
I don't entirely understand why you're attacking me right now.
For instance, showing that I registered today -- as if people didn't know that already. Might I remind you that in my first post I wrote the following: "Long time reader, first time poster." You don't need an account to read. You do need one to post.
Additionally, I don't understand why you're saying it's "BS" that they've not lied to me yet.
Finally, I further don't understand why you think I'm "something else buddy" because I asked you to tell me when/how the new management team has lied to you. If in fact they have lied to you, then anyone who is long this stock would certainly want to know about it, since no one likes to lose money.
I really do want to know the instances in which they've lied to you so that I can continue in my evaluation of management. If you don't want to share that information with me or the board, then that's fine -- just say so.
I understand the dynamics of certain posters of this board come from a place of bitterness of having paid roughly $1.50 per share a long time ago. I'd be bitter in your position as well. And I know Ice is your friend, and you might have interpreted my correction of his post as an attack on him. It wasn't. I had not read the Elko articles previously, and once I did, I realized that Ice might have read/remembered the articles wrong. Nobody wants to make decisions on misremembered information, so I thought that a correction would be a benefit for readers of the board.