Good to hear. Still have 75% of shares, Still some risk because the CJS or constitutional court (not the lower supreme court that
caused all the problems), reversed itself pretty fast after THO had first said
that they got word the higher constitutional court had rejected a quick
resumption of mining for THO.
Then after a week apparently changed that decision if the article found, is
correct.
Assuming of course the article found by mpdsn777 is valid and correct about
the higher constitutional court's decision.
At the top right hand corner of the link, the article can be changed into English
https://miningworks.gt/actualidad/csj-ordenan-reanudar-los-trabajos-de-minera-en-san-rafael/ We will find out on monday, if an official PR release by THO comes out.
Though I guess is is possible the higher constitutional court might not
release the news tomorrow but when it wants to.
However THO should comment on the link above regardless. Whether it has
the probability of legitimacy or not.
Even if the news is legitimate i'm not buying back the other 25% I sold.
I don'lt like what is going on in south america with the UN's double clout of
C169 indigenous rights resolution for the world, UN's legal arm in Guatemala
and it seems most nations now, and the US going after OPEC member Venezuela
for not wanting to sell it's oil in the falling US dollar.
The whole thing has been an eye opening and further education for me on
how the world works and directions it is moving in. Not to a constitutional
electable UN body, where all peoples, not just voting nations positions on the
UN assembly have a say how it works and the world is run as a whole.
Illhevad1 the article you found, ie ‘Who will save the poor from the planet
saver’s’ at
https://www.thesavvystreet.com/who-will-save-the-poorest-from-the-planet-savers/ is very good but very misleading. The same group, lets call them the bankers and
banker corporations, that sponsored communist writers so soon after republic/
democracy emerged (which was not just capitalism but a social and political contract,
a constitution, and what would be called a mixed economy in the center),
also
sponsored far right writers like Ayn Rand and property and business people only
voting, making the competition very artificial and polarized far right and far right,
(capitalist private ownership of business vs communist or state ownership of business).
Why polarize it so soon after the amazing revolution of the republic/democracy
emerged again, after almost 2000 years after Rome’s republic democracy went
down by the end of the first century BC or BCE (replacing BC, as CE ie common
era designation, has replaced AD).
As if was creating an alternative form of dumbing down form of secular xtianity
with 'the peoples morality' replacing god's morality. An atheism no less putting it
at odds with both capitalism and xtianity - a double dialectic conflict.
Like it is still pretending to be the true conflict in nations and the world. Though
the same elites have no problem trading with especially china’s state capitalism
(euphemism for communism) and the new Silk Road, that like I said, is taking
over in the world now, and never went away. Which you really wanted me to
explain.
Here is the Jews in the old silk road, that would grow into the court jews, banking
system, cental banks and multinational corporations, dominance.
https://www.silkroadgourmet.com/the-jews-of-the-great-silk-road/ This became the trade mark of the Diaspora Jews, and no doubt long before
the captivity stages:
"Dating back almost three millennia, the Jewish community in Iran is the oldest
in Asia. Originating as enslaved subjects in ancient Babylon (now, Iraq), Jews
first settled within the territory of modern-day Iran after the Persian emperor
Cyrus conquered Babylon in 539 BCE, freeing the Jewish slaves and making
them an integral part of the Persian Empire. As Persian subjects, Jews traveled
widely and did business in Persian dominated lands from Afghanistan, the
Caucasus and Caspian through Central Asia."
The jews said to be the origin of xtianity but strangely never adopting it, so that
as they became the silk road bankers for Rome and then eruopean history,
they never would have become the competing thorn in the side, competition to
xtian rule on all levels of society, banking, media, merchants, and professional
classes, especially. Or later of communism vs capitalism or mixed democracy
as the vote was extended to everyone, as the republic emerged again after
2000 years, and threatened their so called judeo/xtian monarch dominance.
Yet the judeo/xtian monarchy dominance could come back if have a non nuclear
world war III, because the big bombs are not really nuclear or radioactive. Then
no need for their communist alternative system either. Religious monarchy is back!
Now the so called new Silk Road by China but it's really by the court jews,
and emerged banking system, central banks and multinational corporations,
dominance. Which is subsuming the dying US republic led west, as it loses
its US dollar leadership, to the yuan's gold based banking and russia's military
in the middle east preventing the continuation of the US petro dollar. A two
prong attack on US's dollar and leadership as result of that loss.
https://www.clivemaund.com/article.php?id=4287 "“So what now? It looks like the Empire (the US’s republic) is going to have to
accept the fact that North Korea has just joined the nuclear club, even if they
don’t have the fancy signed and embossed certificate to hang on the wall, and
skulk off to content itself with meddling in Pakistan to try to disrupt China’s
grand Silk Road project, and keeping the pot boiling in Afghanistan for the
same reason.”
......
......
“If the dollar loses its Reserve Currency status, the severely debt-wracked and
highly leveraged Empire will quickly implode. This is what makes the next
several years so dangerous, because the Empire may decide to try to impose
its will by force while it still has the chance to do so, leading to catastrophic
consequences, and Larry Edelson of Weiss Research has repeatedly pointed
out that there is a confluence of war cycles peaking in 2019 – 2020. ? Looking
on the bright side we know the world is grossly overpopulated, which “unintended
consequences” may go a long way towards addressing. ? (I can't believe the
author would say that)”