Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Diagnos Inc V.ADK

Alternate Symbol(s):  DGNOF

Diagnos Inc. is a Canadian company, which is engaged in early detection of critical health problems based on its FLAIRE artificial intelligence (AI) platform. FLAIRE allows for quick modifying and developing of applications, such as computer assisted retina analysis (CARA). CARA’s image enhancement algorithms provide sharper, clearer and easier-to-analyze retinal images. CARA is a tool for real-time screening of large volumes of patients. It provides software-based services to assist health specialists in the detection of diabetic retinopathy and other eye-related pathologies. Its geographical areas include Canada, the United States of America, Mexico, and Chile. The Company’s subsidiaries include Diagnos Internacional SA de CV and Diagnos Healthcare (India) Private Limited.


TSXV:ADK - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by invertedhammeron Nov 27, 2015 12:36am
53 Views
Post# 24330391

RE:RE:RE:IRIS

RE:RE:RE:IRIS
I've read the news releases as they came out, no need to go back. The release makes it sound like CARA doesn't need a human reader to analyse and confirm that treatment is needed. However, Andre Larente clarified this for me; specialists are in fact needed to assess/read the image and confirm the need for treatment. Screening is the first stage of weeding out the good from the bad. If I recall correctly, IRIS claims that 35% of patients screened for DR prove to qualify for treatment. Whether 35% of patients are actually confirmed and referred to treatment is a different story. That number seems kind of high. I'm thinking that only a portion of that 35% actually proceeds to the next stage - visiting a specialist to receive treatment.
Bullboard Posts

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse