RE: curious on whyFKloster,
10 Minutes after the Corporation issues a great news that confirm that Management is actually making certain that the project is advancing, you still find a way to go ahead and take another stab at management ! Wow how pathetic !
For me the most important point in the report is the date, January 2011, that means that when afa management was stating that the report report review was being un-duly held up by the exchange they are right because other then the signature and other small details, there are no majors changes between this report and the one done in November...
The second most important point is that the sampling will start soon, so once again it is clear that they have not been sleeping of the job, but actually advancing the file while you guys just complained...
Now, as per your great technical question, Cost per sample and time wasted during the change of the material, therefore exploration programme are usually design to optimize the work that will be done doing will be done using the smallest number of material change. So if the majority of the sample are in area were the 8 meters penetration is sufficient then, you plan your programme around that fact...