RE: Read before accusing (Part 2)
Well it is clear that you don't follow the events. If it was the case, you would know that the first $ 2 million was spent in the last sampling and that they have completed the first part to acquire the 20%.
This is what I was saying in my previous post. You show only bits of information that seems to prove your point but anyone reading all press releases on the matter will know that you are wrong. However, it shows again that you only like to spread misleading information.
This is not correct and your playing a dangerous game.