Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF V.AGG


Primary Symbol: AGG

The iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of the total U.S. investment-grade bond market. The index measures the performance of the total U.S. investment-grade bond market. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its net assets in component securities of its underlying index and in investments that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the component securities of its underlying index.


ARCA:AGG - Post by User

Comment by jdn55on Jan 03, 2012 9:56pm
170 Views
Post# 19367527

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Nikiforuk is a

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Nikiforuk is a

T2

Just what exactly are your referring to when you say "these guys are chronic"??? That line taken in context with the rest of your sentence implied that AGG management was "chronically" dipping into AGG's kitty for management loans IMO. Please feel free to clarify if I interpreted your statement incorrectly.

Re: your other statements from your last post, for the 3rd time, I agree with you re: website. I also agree that, in general, management could do a better job on the PR/IR side but with that said my question becomes how do you promote in such current crappy markets when there is no audience and funds are facing big redemptions and the little guys are too scared to get back in the market?????

On the positive side from the operations/management side management has:

- managed to acquire the Kobada property; no mean feat considering the interest in that land package at the time they acquired it

- have developed a 1.1 MM oz very valuble oxide deposit that I believe is actually closer to 2 MM oz when taking into account the "nugget" effect characteristics of this deposit

- had the forsight to raise a big chunk of cash a year ago for operations

........and I could go on and on "waving the pom poms" but am just trying to add some counterbalance to your very critical comments.

I do see objectively including negatives and positives but IMO (and my opinion only) the positives far outweigh the negatives or I would have been long gone from AGG years ago. Being critical isn't a bad thing and can be quite contructive at times when being objective but one thing I've learned long ago is not to criticize someone unless you're prepared to take a walk in their boots......which is always an option through proxy if you feel you can do better.......keeping in mind you'll have to get Sprott, Pinetree and the other big boys on side. If these guys management skills are akin to running a lemonade stand surely you could do better!!

I expect my old friend BP should be riding in to defend you anytime now (when he finished licking his KGN wounds) LOL.

This really is my last post now for a couple of weeks!!!

GLTA

 

Bullboard Posts