RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: ar Blue - That was a piece of advice from a friendly co-user of this blogging community - it wasn't a threat from me or the company. I'm an investor in this company and frankly, i find both your tone and assumptions to be of extremely bad taste and quite slanderous.
You seem to have a vandetta here - and again, from one friendly and (very experienced) investor to another, I'm recommending that you think twice before posting anything here. I agree completely about having freedom of opinion, but again, your assumptions and tone on this blog are extreme, quite assumptive and judging what i've seen happy many times on other blogs, i'd recommend you watch what you say. Again, this isn't a threat. I don't work for the company. I'm a rational investor giving advice to a somewhat irrational user right now. The same way you've assumed and stated that Fiorino is only doing what's best for him and making derogatory and defametory comments about him and AMG, you're now doing the same about myself. You've done absolutely no other research. You clearly haven't called either company. You've read a few press releases and come on here and made extreme assumptions and bad-mouthed everyone associated with these companies.
This is a free country, but when you defame a person and company in the way you have, you're pushing the boundaries and at this point, fabricating things in a tone which makes one think you have an alterior motive here - and you're really opening yourself to problems. Again, this isn't a threat, it's advice and a reality. Do with it whatever you choose.
Arguing that you disagree with what a company does is one thing.
Posting defametory comments and posting a link to the BCC complaint site without doing any primary, first-hand research, clearly shows lack of good judgement, inexperience as an investor and frankly alterior motives.