Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum American Creek Resources Ltd V.AMK

Alternate Symbol(s):  ACKRF

American Creek Resources Ltd. is a Canada-based junior mineral exploration company, which is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties, principally for precious metal deposits. The Company’s projects include Treaty Creek and Austruck-Bonanza. The Treaty Creek Project covers approximately 114 square km in the Skeena Mining District of northern British Columbia and is... see more

TSXV:AMK - Post Discussion

View:
Post by fordster on Jun 20, 2024 3:54pm

So Larry

Why is that idea slanderous? Common sense dictates Tudor would like to own as much of TC as possible. And if "insiders" are in control of AMK, there's no fraud because the rest of us don't mater at that point...and a shell company is a perfect vehicle. It would take a few more steps to complete it. In the mean time, AMK is bought out at a cheap/fair price without anyone creating a frenzy on the SP...you act as if it's never been done before.
Comment by Larry60 on Jun 20, 2024 4:15pm
If TUD was behind the shell, and theyre not imho, they would need to disclose that for a number of reasons!  The usual plain true and timely disclosure requirement would apply.  In this case, if it were a an actual bid, and its not, additional disclosure would kick in as well! To hold back this info would be a grave violation of securities lwas. KK would never do that!!!! But dont ...more  
Comment by Signman on Jun 20, 2024 8:03pm
For what it is worth I specifically asked Kelin if any of the board or owners were going obver to Cunningham after the sale and he said no. Not that I would expect not to hear that. And a change of heart "unexpectantly" could occur after the sale... that is what he said. Keep in mind all the media "expert TV doctors" pushing the mystery juices and RX just happen to get cushy ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities