Q and A with Larry....Needs to happenYes, I have been a frequent Larry basher, but I am still a large AMY shareholder, which is where my frustration comes from.
In it for the long haul is one thing, but also trying to understand the stumbling blocks is another.
AMY's process works....or so we have been told. Not only does it work, it's patented, it's apparently now very cost effective. Larry post constant article on how great AMY could be as their is huge demand for it's product. Yet, out of all the possible customers for AMY, no one has signed on. Again I bring your attention to LiCycle, who just got a 200 million dollar contract from the State of New York. Why did they not choose AMY. AMY is working with the DOE on this issue so why have no States picked this tech up?
Listening to Larry and how he fumbles and stumbles trying to explain himself is the only hurtle I think AMY has. If investors/shareholders are confused and frustrated with his level of communication then what are the potential customers thinking. Maybe they are staying away because of Larry. If everything is so great then why no action...absolutely zero. It makes no sense at this stage of the game. Either something is seriously wrong or Larry is the problem.
How would Larry due on Shark Tank? Would Zarko do better?
AMY has been an utter stock failure given what it is touting that it's tech can do. In the real business world that would land on management. Larry has been unable to market AMY to any potential partners. A change is needed whether you like Larry or not.
It's not personal....just business.