RE:Ok,John Matt, You've shared a very open opinion regarding management and the company over the years.
Other authors and posters have contributed to this forum only to have you tear them apart over deemed inaccuracies in their information.
Yet you give this article accolades that this is new and important information.
As a long time share holder, do you really think this author has any credibility with his facts, especially after stating his stance on 6 rules of thumb. 3 of 6 I underlined are very debatable and your stance regarding management is contrary to the author.
Your turning a blind eye to statements that are inaccurate and supporting/presenting embellished segments.
Why no criticism of this article?