Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Aurcana Silver Corp V.AUN.H

Aurcana Silver Corporation is a Canada-based company, which is engaged in the exploration, development, and operation of natural resource properties. The Company’s development properties are the Revenue-Virginius mine (the Revenue-Virginius mine or Ouray), located in Ouray Colorado and held through the Company’s 100% owned United States subsidiary, Ouray Silver Mines, Inc. (OSMI) and the Shafter silver property (the Shafter Silver Project or Shafter), located in Presidio County, Texas and held Aurcana Silver Corporation. The Revenue-Virginius mine is located in southwestern Colorado about 5.5 miles southwest of the town of Ouray. Access to the mine site is via County Road 361. The Shafter Silver Project, which is 375 miles southeast of El Paso, in Presidio County, southwest Texas, within a historic mining district.


TSXV:AUN.H - Post by User

Post by andre171on Jan 26, 2022 3:43am
177 Views
Post# 34361034

Current reserves not good basis ?

Current reserves not good basis ?I believe that the current reserves do not constitute a good basis for assessment because it is an underground mine without the possibility of drilling and exploring from the surface. From then on, exploration will continue as the underground develops. On the other hand, it would be unreasonable to incur exploration costs for an area too early before its exploitation. They have historical drilling on the whole (which they cannot include in current calculations), but current estimates are only based on the 400 meters of vein. Therefore, it seems difficult to me to evaluate Aurcana on the basis of its resources. It would be unwise to assume future exploration results, but it would also be inappropriate to consider only current resources (which would only cover the estimated production of 4 or 5 years). I have a feeling that the resources should have been constantly at the current level over the years!
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>