salbando....a short note I noticed that you stated "good management" in your SA post.............I take it you do not agree that there is good management there, based on your inclusion of these little guys..... " ".
Let me just make an effort to clear things up here. EAS went to 8.00 or so and dropped from there due to what again?
SA was at 1.95 and is now at .66 due to what? SA's drop in shareprice price can easily be justified by simply reading the news. A failure to reach a credit resolve dropped all the stocks a while back, and in addition to that SA had 8 rigs burned out by some thugs who did not wish to give up their lucrative business of thieving from the locals. It has mnothing to do with management whatsoever, clearly.
In the case of EAS however.......I would dare to say that the price has nearly everything to do with management. There is no comparison with the two. SA managem,ent actually has some skin in the game and the CEO holds a large position, that he never trades, BTW...........on the other hand, we all saw what MH and the other EAS insiders did, yes? And current management seesm to be cut of the same cloth, no?
Just wanted to set the record straight , in case anyone actually believed that you could put the two management teams on the same level.
cheers,
Vwig.