Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Aston Bay Holdings Ltd V.BAY

Alternate Symbol(s):  ATBHF

Aston Bay Holdings Ltd. is a Canada-based mineral exploration company exploring high-grade copper and gold deposits in Virginia, United States, and Nunavut, Canada. The Company is exploring the high-grade Buckingham Gold Vein in central Virginia and is in advanced stages of negotiations on other lands with high-grade copper potential in the area. The Company is focused on its Blue Ridge Project... see more

TSXV:BAY - Post Discussion

Aston Bay Holdings Ltd > hole 4 Chalcopyrite = a bust and to deep
View:
Post by Tipster2023 on Aug 19, 2023 8:57am

hole 4 Chalcopyrite = a bust and to deep

I wish to maintain my reputation for transparency - sold last of my $BAY.v this morning (cue the backlash). A good part of MinTwit thrives on negativity, still worth listening to for sure - but Brent Cook isn’t someone who says something just to belittle retail. /1
Quote
 
 
Brent Cook
 
@BrentCookgeo
Replying to @jenstilmanydots
Hmm. .Chalcopyrite, the mineral contains 34% Cu. This is what to be aware of: Chalcocite vs Bornite vs Chalcopyrite. At that depth and location it better be Bornite + Chalcocite >> Chalcopyrite. @JoeMazumdar @ExplorationIns1 went thru this in detail last week

Post

 
See new Tweets
 

Conversation

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I wish to maintain my reputation for transparency - sold last of my $BAY.v this morning (cue the backlash). A good part of MinTwit thrives on negativity, still worth listening to for sure - but Brent Cook isn’t someone who says something just to belittle retail. /1
Quote
 
 
Brent Cook
 
@BrentCookgeo
Replying to @jenstilmanydots
Hmm. .Chalcopyrite, the mineral contains 34% Cu. This is what to be aware of: Chalcocite vs Bornite vs Chalcopyrite. At that depth and location it better be Bornite + Chalcocite >> Chalcopyrite. @JoeMazumdar @ExplorationIns1 went thru this in detail last week
Comment by Patrick2Linton on Aug 19, 2023 9:43am
Jenn... "It may very well turn out to be a world class discovery, in which case I might regret exiting now, but I also have some time to add on the next rise if actual assays return something of significance." /2 Good for Jenn to take her profit. People buy and sell for different reasons. Its a market.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities