RE:RE:RE:It's all useless :-)pointer wrote: Another total waste of reader's time by the Rude fool.
I always wonder why people who obviously don't do any real DD, and just surf the internet for useless distractions, think they can influence the thinking of those of us who take our investments seriously.
Unfortunately, putting him on ignore doesn't stop other idiots from including his krap in their posts.
skiptoggle wrote: Not so much of a competitor as a displacer. Remember PIPE's condensate is valuable in it's own right. So if this does take off it shouldn't impact PIPE's financials too much if at all.
The other point because is this is still experimental, will it scale up to industrial volumes on an economic operational basis? I recall a discussion a few years ago on converting heavy bitumen into baseball sized blobs and transporting in rail cars with water. That was touted as the "end of condensate". I was skeptical about that method, and to date, I have not heard about that method taking over heavy bitumen transport.
Perhaps by the time this concept comes to fruition PIPE will have been taken out.
Just my $0.005 worth of opinion.
RuudinFrance wrote: We got us a competitor for our condensate!
Enjoy
The new competitor Have fun
P.S.: Certainly watch the sections concerning upgrading of heavy oil.
You're the man Skip and your arguments are valid.
Stacking of solid "pucks" in lorries was another one.
I'm sure some of you checked the ACT stockperformance for the very long time they've been noted on the exchange :-)
Surely our local DD "expert" did, before blowing off gas once more :-)
Pointer, the floor is yours?
Have fun.