Post by
Retiredgeo on Jan 08, 2024 12:49pm
Mineralization
From the published cross sections note that the Copper and Molybdenum mineralization is independent of the host rocks, meaning, it post dates the layering. From the evidence to date all four holes are in the phyllic zone of a giant porphyry intrusion either down below or off to one side. Why hole 5 was bornite-rich and the others weren't is an unanswered question. There may have been a second mineralizing event related to those particular dykes or perhaps those dykes were closer to the intrusion. We need more data.
In geology, nothing is as simple as you want it to be.
Comment by
CaptainM on Jan 08, 2024 4:24pm
Meant to add that the IP and assays are signaling the same thing: to the North/West is where the grade is better. Smart move but the company to stake the land.
Comment by
Chefboy69 on Jan 08, 2024 4:46pm
no one cares about BIG or NILI or pmet or any of these old pumps...tsxv/cse money( in other words ceo.ca) traders just move to whatever is running today it was AE...who knows what tomorrow it will be WHO CARES!!!!!!!!
Comment by
MoneyK on Jan 08, 2024 6:12pm
You seem to care with the amount of posts per day. MoneyK
Comment by
CaptainM on Jan 09, 2024 10:52pm
To add to my last post, so perhaps the theory that some dykes were closer to the intrusion is the correct one. When combined with the IP anomaly in the North (and west) of hole 5 and the extra land being secured there (from last NR), it may be that the intrusion is closer to hole 5.
Comment by
CaptainM on Jan 10, 2024 3:45am
But then again, these are post-mineralized dykes. Do they really have that much of an effect?
Comment by
Retiredgeo on Jan 10, 2024 7:13am
Unlikely, unless they are huge and recooked everything (a sill).
Comment by
hashboy18 on Jan 10, 2024 11:32am
this is a real crappy stock with shaddy promoters,Im issuing a strong sell witha ,40 target