There are 2 bay's closest to Scadding. (Outlet Bay + South East Bay )
I decided to further my research to provide further support of a reef deposit.
If Bonanza offers an 1800 ft x 60 ft fissure i said....
There has got to be a far larger fault to trigger the 1800 ft fissure.
If my reef theory is to - hold weght - i eould have to prove the Wanapitei 2 Bays blew out in a south east direction inorder to scatter broken fragmented breccia and gabbro - i know the edgesare still
sharp - which supports the intrusioin ore had ot come close by.
If my theory is to ring true...
it would mean the two Bays mentioned above - cloest to Scadding - would rip right through
the upper Scad pit and west side of, main Scadding pit - pass through Johnston occurence and also include the Scadding south pit and contiune on courseof a water blow out form the bays, causing not only a water path but als opartial flooding.
HERE'S A MAP TO REGAIN ONE'S BEARINGS 
THE WANAPITEI FALUT North of Wanapitei lies the Matchewan swam of dykes...
Then Kapuskasing fault system, which runs right into Wanapitei Lake.
It ids theorized that tihs fault aligns with the western side of Wanapitei Lake.
They're not too sure on this.. it's poorly understood and lost likely becasue there a lake
hiding the fault...lol
But... let's now pul lforth the Bonanza fissure/fault occurence - 1800 ft long x 60 fee wide.
Seiing a fault of this size is not your ordinary fault.
And there's the connective iwas looking for - a larger system that triggered the Bonanza fault -
The pdf paper suggests it swings to th ewest... but... hopw does one explain away all the
shrapnel and fragments on - bonanza, johnston, scadding, red rock at shallow depths ?
i would have ot say... even if the fault was center of lake... and if sufficient water flow passed
through - it would carry the fragments of shard rock andgoldfrom the larger fault in adirection
of easiest path of water flow. Such would point to the - SOUTHERN BAYS OF WANAPITEI.
Water does not full bays for no reason. Bayas are perimeters of the lake and are signs of
resistence points of low lying areas. My hunch says... the bays blew out with flooding and
carried the gold ores in a directional path of least resistence - Wanapitei's 2 eastern bays would fit this criteria.
To know for sure where the fault is positioned, and which side of Wanapitei if favored to discard its shrapnel ores without seeing below the lake ... One would only need to research the western bay of Wanapitei to see if any drilling encountered the fragmented gabbro/breccia.
Now.. i did read last eve.. .that drilling was performed by several on the other side of Wanapitei Lake.. The iron formation begins at this point. Which, could sway the support to the eastern + southern zones of Wanapitei as most likely recieving the - ores from the supposed fault benieth Wanapitei Lkae.
Caption from the pdf paper - Mattagami River fault appears to connect southward with the prominent south-southeast-trending Upper Wanapitei River fault. In the vicinity of Wanapitei Lake (Fig. 4), the Upper Wanapitei River fault is usually drawn with a substantial swing to the southeast (e.g., Ontario Geological Survey 199 1). However, geological relationships are poorly defined beneath the lake and rather complicated because of the maze of faults of varying trends south of the lake (Card and Lumbers 1977) PDF LINK - 9 pages - quick read on the fault systems. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiqrIiVlZ3vAhWEUt8KHZNZDZ0QFjAAegQIARAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nrcresearchpress.com%2Fdoi%2Fpdf%2F10.1139%2Fe94-105&usg=AOvVaw1Nj6gLU5iL0Yz-NjgRk9G7
WRAP IT UP -
Find that south east swath that the 2 bays listed above would make if both blew out and
ported their waters - it would be the same width as the scadding claims in red shown in
above map - swing the swath on a curvature arking towards the south - pasing through
scadding but moreso ending southerly... jbonanza all th eway to scadding main pit
this size example of thickness in swath, could have high probabilities of ores from the
the larger ( assumed ) fault beneith Wanapitei Lake.
There.. i feel there's one mare significant connective to support a reef basin which
was caused by a - larger lake and larger fault system. Makes sense to me. wink.
Now.. will BMK send out 3 fierld crews with winkies - to test ot 50 ft depths on the cheap
to see if the goldis there ? Helluva lot better than, rock hounding.
Lots of posts - lots to ponder.
Cheers...