RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Feasibility Study vs Bankable Feasibility StudyPFS, FS, BFS, Positive FS, Final FS, Positive Bankable FS... it doesn't matter.
Clearly a PFS is different from a FS, BFS, Positive FS, Final FS, Positive Bankable FS.
Bankable or not is nothing more than "marketing" of the Feasibility Study. It really doesn't matter if the word bankable is in the title or not. It contains the same information.
If you need financing, you put "bankable" in the title.
If you don't need financing and simply want to determine if the project is feasible, you don't put "bankable" in the title. It really is as simple as that.
Well written Feasibility Study is better than a poorly written Bankable Feasibility Study? I highly doubt that a respected company like SRK Consulting, Tetra Tech, Behre Dolbear, etc. would ever write a "poorly written" Feasibility Study.
A Feasibility Study is a Feasibility Study is a Feasibility Study. I personally couldn't care less if it is described as Bankable or not.
Scotty1234,
Who are you calling old?
Seriously though, I have not sold a single share since I sold my entire position a day or two before Erin Ventures announced that they had lost the Piskanja deposit to Rio Tinto.
I have been accumulating EV shares ever since. I bought again in December and I'm thinking of buying more now or in the near future.
VB