RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Bidding war?Chrispi, if DNLI even thought that BTI could advance their programs than we would be them!
We are pocket change to them! They could even take a "flyer" in hopes it works! And they wouldn't even notice the loss if it didn't work out!
That's seems to be a regular issue here!
Keep it real and you guys are just so off base!
You make zero sense!
beenthere, your ignorance is showing thru in spades with that clearly-lacking-thought post.
JD has already stated (and probably more than once) why Denali would never take us over, basically it would be admitting there are problems with their BBB technology and they were hedging their bets or wanted a solution that worked. Do you think they want to do that with still having a multi-billion $ market cap and a lot of high priced execs and employees that would be impacted by such an admission? We are not a complementary technology to Denali, we are a competing technology. Just because they have the funds to buy us (for multiples of our current share price) doesn't mean it makes sense for them to do so.
You want to rethink your post again? perhaps after you've done some serious thinking about it? perhaps like a serious investor who has done their DD?