Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bioasis Technologies Inc. V.BTI

Alternate Symbol(s):  BIOAF

Bioasis Technologies Inc. is a multi-asset rare and orphan disease biopharmaceutical company developing clinical stage programs based on epidermal growth factors and the xB3™ platform, a proprietary technology for the delivery of therapeutics across the blood brain barrier and the treatment of CNS disorders in areas of high unmet medical need. The in-house development programs are designed to develop symptomatic and disease-modifying treatments for brain-related diseases and disorders.


TSXV:BTI - Post by User

Comment by JDavenporton May 12, 2022 5:51pm
146 Views
Post# 34679618

RE:RE:Accountability for Low-value Deals

RE:RE:Accountability for Low-value Deals
You're arguing for low-price deals for xB3, poof. I'm arguing that they should have much higher valuations consistent with other industry deals. Worse, you try to use the US $284 million AbbVie/Caraway deal to make your point. Laffer, that...!
 
This is important. Your argument that xB3 and the drugs it enables are unproven and therefore don't warrant higher milestone payments is uninformed and runs contrary to industry practice. All milestone payments are made as drugs are further proven and, therefore, derisked. Milestone payments exist to mitigate financial risk for the buyer and yet allow the seller to get a proper price for a finally-proven (commercial) drug. Therefore, the milestone payment terms are influenced by the size of the commercial opportunity that the drug presents. 
 
Georgeparros, I think that Bioasis and its advisers know what drugs are worth. I think Bioasis needs the money, DrDR needs to report deals, the pharmas are driving hard bargains, etc, etc. For this kind of money, Neuramedy should have been turned down.
 
I believe that any drug entering such an immense market that Parkinson's disease (PD) presents is a drug that has blockbuster potential, especially since PD patients will likely require treatment for the rest of their lives.
 
I get that Neuramedy is providing the payload, Tomaralimab. But it's xB3 that could extend the original Opsona OPN305 (patent #8,734,794) and permit the treatment of PD patients. If xB3-Tomaralimab becomes a blockbuster, then the royalty had best be big because the milestone payments don't reflect the opportunity. But I don't have much confidence in undisclosed royalty terms, not after the 1% that Prothena got. Remember that Shire made a deal with Armagen for $11 million up fron and $225 million in milestones for a single LSD, Hunter Syndrome. Bioasis isn't even coming close on anything.
 
Worse, again, Bioasis is sending the signal that xB3 can be had on the cheap. I think that the Neuramedy deal with little up front, a secret royalty and only US$72 million in undefined milestones is not a good deal.
 
And the market completely ignored it. I didn't cause that. Bioasis caused it.
 
jd
 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>