Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Bioasis Technologies Inc. V.BTI

Alternate Symbol(s):  BIOAF

Bioasis Technologies Inc. is a multi-asset rare and orphan disease biopharmaceutical company developing clinical stage programs based on epidermal growth factors and the xB3™ platform, a proprietary technology for the delivery of therapeutics across the blood brain barrier and the treatment of CNS disorders in areas of high unmet medical need. The in-house development programs are designed to... see more

TSXV:BTI - Post Discussion

Bioasis Technologies Inc. > Some Clarifications and Comments
View:
Post by JDavenport on Nov 30, 2020 10:38am

Some Clarifications and Comments

I am not and have never been an employee of Bioasis. I am an independent commentator and, as such, I believe that my legal and practical relationships with Bioasis are much the same as the company has with Edison, Tailwinds, Zacks, Stockhouse, [paid promotional message] and others. I have posted full disclosures on this forum and therefore they are part of the public record. These disclosures describe my relational and legal responsibilities with respect to Bioasis, responsibilities that other posters do not have to concern themselves with. Anonymous Stockhouse posters, like most participants in all social media, need to worry only about the legal consequences of telling lies about people who are not anonymous.
 
I have always maintained substantial distance from the company. I have rarely called the CEO or anybody else, and that is for two very practical reasons. The first is obvious. As a commentator, I really don’t want to know confidential stuff. Confidential information completely ruins a commentator’s ability to comment, to express considered opinion. It especially ruins a commentator’s ability to objectively speculate about his client’s potential actions, possibilities and probabilities. When an analyst’s opinion is influenced by confidential information then nondisclosure agreements are implicitly broken and disclaimers become false. For commentators, that can cause potential legal issues with both regulators and clients. 
 
The second thing about insider knowledge and selective disclosure is that if leaks occur, it can’t be blamed on the commentator if the commentator was never told about it in the first place. I used to go weeks without talking with Rob Hutchison. Mark Day caused me endless problems by calling me several times a week. My relationship with Deborah Rathjen, while being cordial, is nevertheless by far the most distant of all three CEOs. I don't even average one call a month. Dr. Rathjen takes compliance with regulations and contractual obligations very seriously. I generally am told nothing about anything and that works just fine for me. I’m pretty good at figuring things out for myself.
 
I absolutely did not know about Dr. Rathjen’s appointment to the position of CEO of Carina until AlfredSisley posted the links to it on Saturday morning, November 28, 2020. Since the Carina announcement on July 8, 2020, I have spoken to Dr. Rathjen twice, and there was not a hint of the Carina stuff or anything like it on either call.
 
Had I been informed of Dr. Rathjen’s appointment at Carina, I would have immediately done two things. I would have advised her to make an immediate public announcement in such a way that Bioasis shareholders would be assured of knowing about it right away, and of hearing of it directly from herself or Bioasis and not from Carina. You don’t allow shareholders to learn about such a thing by some accident of discovery. You should stay in front of something like this. That is a blunt criticism of how the thing was handled. (But it's still only my opinion. I doubt there was any rule or agreement broken with the way it was handled.)
 
Secondly, I WOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY POSTED THE NEWS HERE, the moment I found it, no question, no doubt. As far as I am concerned, because the news was posted in a public place, it would not have broken my nondisclosure agreement to reveal the news on this forum or anywhere else.
 
Whatever my relationship with Bioasis and its CEO might be, it exists almost solely because of my relationship with, and support from, shareholders. Somebody like me is a pain in the butt for a public company because they can't control me and don't even want to try. And I don't take either the company or its shareholders for granted. Too many people, both shareholders and Bioasis insiders, have too much at stake for me to be wantonly messing around with them.

The shareholders get opinions and knowledge from me that they will absolutely not find anywhere else. I take that very seriously. I'm ok with being stuck between the shareholders and the company. Dealing with both is simple. All it takes is truth and honour. 
 
Speaking of knowledge and opinions, I hope to have three posts out this week. The first, which I really hope to get out today, is the post about “Things That Would Not Surprise Me.” I want to get that on the record. The second is about Popeye82’s post on November 14 about glioblastoma that he entitled, “NEW Discovery. I have done considerable reading about the topics raised in the referenced University of Michigan article and I think you’ll find it all very interesting. And, of course, progranulin has recently appeared in Bioasis literature, so we had best have a look at that, what it is, and what Bioasis may be chasing with respect to it. These posts will not appear here. 
 
Ok, work to do, later...
 
Davenport
Comment by MineDigger on Nov 30, 2020 11:55am
jd, as you are keen to point out your transparency with the likes of  "I have posted full disclosures on this forum and therefore they are part of the public record.", please could you confirm/deny that this 2014 summary (below) is correct, or has it been superceeded as suggested by a more recent 2020 statement that said "I remain as independent from Bioasis as any other ...more  
Comment by JDavenport on Nov 30, 2020 1:32pm
The text you have posted is disclosure on my part, MineDigger. It announces that I signed a contract with Bioasis for the purposes disclosed. I also had such disclosures elsewhere and on my website when it was active.  I have signed two agreements with Bioasis, more if nondisclosure agreement are counted. I signed a new agreement with Bioasis in February of 2019. The agreement was ...more  
Comment by MineDigger on Dec 03, 2020 6:30am
Thanks for the clarificationjd, but that throws an interesting light on your August post: "I will not discuss it [Digitel] much further except to point out that I am not paid by Bioasis for IR work or for my posting here or anywhere else. With respect to expressing my opinions about Bioasis, I remain as independent from Bioasis as any other shareholder." [My Highlights] But, as usual ...more  
Comment by craighenry on Nov 30, 2020 7:59pm
Thanks for that JD. However not needed in my opinion. You dont owe those Trolls anything. Zip! Zero! MBT123 is probably a little punk millennial who cant take accountability for his trades and blames everyone but himself for losses. Those of us who have been here for awhile and have significant skin in the game appreciate the work you do. As for the news on DR, I agree 100%. She should have ...more  
Comment by regardless on Nov 30, 2020 9:23pm
One month left in this year and if she doesn't deliver is another lucrative deal she ought to be replaced the company does need full attention  you can't tell me that we are getting what's deserved as shareholders when someone any all in where they work. not detracting from her whatsoever but it makes a man wonder if she could have delivered sooner and more deals had she been ...more  
Comment by OysterBuctouche on Dec 02, 2020 10:33am
What a fabulous and well thought out contributor. No deal by Christmas and fire the CEO ?  You have little to no information. You have no idea what is currently in discussions ? You have no back up plan ?  You really put a lot of thought into this one. The same guy that things PR will deliver a 20 bagger in SP. Can you please do us all a favor and either sell your shares or stop ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities