RE:RE:RE:Take over is suspectThat sounds like a more than reasonable explanation! And I like the math ;-) $$$$
Devils advocate here though....why would Sprott sell 2mm shares before prospective results and why would he sell specifically enough shares to not report it...when he wants to sell the rest?
I smell fish and it ain't mama's calamari!
I'm not running around the house in my underwear and a tin foil hat. (The wife gets pissed when I do that and I just confuse the dog) I'm just trying to flip the coin guys. How likely is it he would sell knowing that potentially "game changing" results were on the way?