RE: Economics Revisited - SnowI enjoy your posts, and you are one of the most level-headed people on this board, if not the most level-headed. I felt in the last occasion that your comments has a much higher "misleadable" potential than is the norm for you.
The GXS and Golconda holes simply are not comparable, apples to apples, IMO. What bearing the CDB historic holes may have to any economic coal seams nearby, I wil not even venture a guess. There is a thick sequence of coal-bearing formation there which may have possibities. Even if it is sandy and unconsolodated.
PS. I also recant any Ravenscrag association with the area. There is something strange about the geology in the Wapawekka area, though, IMO.