RE:RE:RE:Very high debt levelhuntergatherer1 wrote: Righand2 - while I agree there is some drivel on the boards here and there - these posters - who ever they are bring up legit points - the presentation I see is from a month ago but shows debt as of last q - not current. These boards are to raise questions and answer them - let's have an open debate to the merits of these investments - and maybe we can find the winners - this may or not be just that. Also people always have to join at somepoint haha I think it's been a little while for me though
I am all open debate, but also know a scumbag when I see one start posting. This Valueinvestor clown raises questions that should be asked of an energy stock, but why does he ignore the fact that all of his questions could be easily answered by simply looking at the presentation? Easy answer, he is trying to raise doubts in the minds of the shareholders who aren't exerienced enough to know a basher when they see one. Scumbag bashers are getting quite sophisticated on this site, and they use all kinds of angles to accomplish their goals.
As for KCK, they could use higher prices just like any other producer. But those who produce nat gas and condensate are in a lot better shape than oil producers or nat gas producers who only have low priced NGLs and no condensate. They are almost giving propane away right now, so be glad we don't have that problem.