Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Cielo Waste Solutions Corp. V.CMC

Alternate Symbol(s):  V.CMC.WT | CWSFF

Cielo Waste Solutions Corp. is a Canada-based waste-to-fuel environmental technology company. The Company's business model is to source waste feedstock from industrial producers and other suppliers and convert the feedstock into valuable fuels. The Company's Thermal Catalytic Depolymerization (TCD) process converts waste feedstocks, including plastics, rubber, organic material, and wood... see more

TSXV:CMC - Post Discussion

Cielo Waste Solutions Corp. > Sweetheart deal
View:
Post by lscfa on Mar 16, 2021 2:47am

Sweetheart deal

Ceilo sells the original tech to directors for peanuts. They spend $2.5 million to improve tech and license it back to Ceilo for $2 million per 4000 lph plant. This stinks.


User image

Comment by lscfa on Mar 16, 2021 3:05am
Excerpt from contract on sedar....
Comment by lscfa on Mar 16, 2021 3:41am
It gers worse the more I dig.....Ceilo buys the original tech from Blue Horizon for $4.25 million plus assumed debt. Ceilo then sells the tech to 1888 (owned by CEO and the directors) for $2.00 (not a typo). 1888 spends $2.5 million to improve the tech and licenses it back to Ceilo for outrageous royalties. The improvement included a hot oil boiler which did not work. Ceilo (not 1888) spent a lot ...more  
Comment by pjmac101 on Mar 16, 2021 4:53am
Great digging and thanks for sharing. I suspected there was some sort of shady agreements that Cielo management doesn't go out of its way to talk about. This is why Cielo has a ceiling on the stock. The fact Cielo doesn't outright own the IP is very damaging to shareholders and I bet most shareholders werent aware of this. I am beginning to wonder if some posters are related to Cielo given ...more  
Comment by sam2100 on Mar 16, 2021 5:10am
Completely disagree, profit arrangements are the norm in the small cap world. If investors don't know this, they are incredibly naive. It looks like Cielo was trying to hide this information.........on SEDAR, that is funny. If you look closely at Cielo's profit sharing arrangement it is substantially less than what is found in the corporate arrangements of the mega cap companies. If ...more  
Comment by Mari2019 on Mar 16, 2021 7:59am
  how naive of a comment. First you blindly read and believe comments from an anonymous poster on a forum. Then you yourself bash without doing your own DD on a company. Lazy and uninformed. Why don't you and Isfca contact Don Allen directly with your questions instead of bashing without knowing the reasons for the numbered company holding the patent.  in the end the intention ...more  
Comment by pjmac101 on Mar 16, 2021 8:09am
Hey that's a good point about protecting it from being taken over by a hostile takeover attempt. Without that asset the IP is safe and the licensing agreement is valuable. Fair point.
Comment by lscfa on Mar 16, 2021 10:30am
B.S.   If someone new buys Ceilo the contract between Ceilo and 1888 remains, which permits Ceilo to acquire the IP and terminate the royalty steam to 1888 for the stipulated purchase price in the contract. Who owns Ceilo is irrelevant. 1888 is just a greedy money grab by CEO and directors.
Comment by Mari2019 on Mar 16, 2021 10:45am
Comment by lscfa on Mar 16, 2021 10:58am
The deal with 1888 was amended Nov 01, 2017. See below.  If each 4000 lph plant has to pay $0.05/litre royalty that's $1.65 million/yr. it makes sense for each plant to pay the termination fee to end the royalty so $1200 x 4000 = $4.8 million. Add this to the $50 million capex to build each plant. 
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities