RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Who was the guy who phone/emailed Sellsby EndZonefor7 wrote: Wish I was paid, but afraid not. I just get deep into my investments and love to discuss them.
Did you email Mark to ask him about the sulfur ? I did and he clarified the metallurgy facts to your FUD and that you don't know what you're talking about.
The very conservative PEA equations won't be the same for the feasibility, they will be even better.
Many holes they haven't released were infill on Crawford meaning not material. 80 more to come though and I expect them to start soon.
smallcap1967 wrote: He has released 6 drill cores with 6 drills turning in one year. What is the problem? I think there are many paid posters here to promote CNC and unfortunately one cannot discuss the shortfalls with either the PEA, the drill cores, or the absence of sulfur, without personal attacks. Selby has been singing the strategic investor song, all through his RNC/Dumont nickel days and just continued here. There are reasons why no major company looks at this project or Dumont even with these record nickel prices
Endzone, I asked a question earlier and was told by someone that Dumont and Crawford cannot be minned profitably because the Sulfur ratio is too low. Then I posted a follow up question about that asking for the reasons why it is wrong. The only answer I got was "If you already know the answer, why did you ask the question?".
Quite Frankly, it is a fair question. If you have the information that I am asking for, please provide it. Otherwise it's a valid point. With these nickle prices, there's a reason why BHP bid on a small high grade deposit 100's of miles in the bush, with Indigenous opposition which may kill the whole thing, and turned their noses at a world class deposit with infrastructure running through the property.