RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:VW signs MOU for Canada Battery PlantWe can quibble over the definition of footnote but the fact remains it's a sub-point of a subsection 8n a PEA that stipulates 100% stainleas steel.
19.4.5 - Ecopro produces battery chemicals and signed a JV with Blackstone to create an integrated battery chemicals operation. CNC believes that it could do the same.
This is literally the same section that you referenced as being a "technical report that shows the amenability of Crawford's concentrate for nickel sulfate." I stand by my editorializing.
Yes, the investor presentation says this. It's prepared by Selby, who has said many things that he's failed to deliver on. Talk is cheap, signed deals and techncial reports aren't.
SamMc1969 wrote: First, it's not a footnote. So that's a, well brother in christ let's just say an untruth. Not very Christian like...second that quote you have looks very suspect...lol. What page on the PEA is that on? Just for reference. Third, a PEA is a "preliminary" economic assessment. On page 32 of the investor presentation states "delivery of nickel units to the ev supply chain will likely be included in the feasibility study" and finally what is the technical basis for your belief that the nickel sulphide at the CNC properties could not be used in the ev battery supply chain? Please supply technical reports to support your position.
I never said that CNC's nickel could not be delivered to the EV supply chain. Even nickel matte can be converted; it's just a matter of cost. But without any sort of testwork demonstrating how we get from nickel concentrate to nickel sulfate, it's difficult to say what those costs are, much less incorporate them into a bankable feasibility study.