RE: RE: Oh, sad, sad deleuzeHere is what I will reply instead Deleuze.
I don't have time for you. You don't have a vested interest here. You are just a dissenter trying to get people to focus on the trivial instead of the 6 billion in the ground and the reason the stock languishes.
You point out the nitpicky and infect everyone with your virus, while ignoring the story that others and I have already laid out for you that includes an NI of 6 billion in the ground in valuable minerals like tantalum and lithium.
I won't waste my time with you.
You are just like Petroh who I asked over a hundred times to lay out an argument against the market cap vs the proven resource and never once did I get an answer on that in even the slightest way.
You are in spirit Petroh.
The first thing I look for in your posts is the big questions and when you don't answer them, then you are a waste of my time.
Just like in hockey, I don't argue an offisde call in the first period in a triple overtime game.