RE:Paid Promo and Good Ole' AnonymousWrote the below yesterday July 5. 18 positions were posted. Today there are 21!! L....O.....L
Maybe they took my comments about hiring another 100+ people literally.
bandit69 wrote: Boy, I am sure glad I bailed.
are they paying for promo now.....? is this equity a penny mining stock?
https://twitter.com/search?q=%24cub.v&src=typed_query&f=live
https://equity.guru/2021/06/30/why-i-am-going-big-on-agriculture-after-this-record-heatwave-and-why-i-am-a-fan-of-cubicfarms-cub-v/
Going BIG on agriculture and this writer is just out to help you see the light. Saving the world. I always go back to this question....if it is such a BIG thing and sooooo good, why are you telling me about it? why aren't you putting every penny in to it for yourself? why do you need to be paid to write a promo letter if it is so good? why try to help me then? wouldn't the return on such a BIG investment be far more than revenue from a letter with a Twitter link?
In addition, why would I even contemplate acting on an equity based on someone's whole 12 years of experience in the markets? I have a few decades.....but I make my money from my investments not off of letter writing. If I wrote a letter, I would front run my readers by default. In addition, the writer obviously has limited following since the share price hasn't moved a millimeter and, as of this writing, has a whopping total of 5 re-Tweets between two article posts on Twitter. Most other letter writers can move a price, even briefly.
Good ole' anonymous is in full force again today. As I said, chop chop chop. Maybe instead of spending shareholder money on massive overhead and a letter writer with grammatical errors (as of this writing, the last paragraph states climate "range" ....clearly should be climate "change"....maybe some editors with 12 years experience in writing would be of good value. lol) it might be better money spent on sales or, better yet, maybe on even more overhead!! Hire another 100+ people and maybe spend a day at go-kart races for staff or something and then do another financing. You know, worthwhile things besides a promo letter.
CUB was such a good story but, that's all it is to me now, a story. A bunch of fluff, no substance. Warren Buffett never paid for a promoter for Berkshire and he would never waste shareholder dollars like that because he values his shareholders too much. He even takes pride that Berkshire only has about 25 people in the office. Maybe a few more now but I would have to catch up on his last few years of letters to shareholders. Regardless, Berkshire is a multi-BILLION dollar corporation and have less staff than CUB and one office. Berkshire's success is from results not promo.
Companies that value shareholder's dollars are in very short supply these days. Sales/results are what will drive a story, not a letter writer.