RE:RE:Comparison PYR vs CVX I think it is a lot of different factors. The biggest is that infrastructure is boring in most investors eyes. It doesn't have the intrigue that high technology, marijuana or green environment has. It's just your every day to day thing. But, saying that, it is the potential to be the new technology for building better and longer lasting roads and bridges. Which will say billions of dollars in the long run. It does have an element of CO2 reduction which brings the green environment into play. To get this in the eyes of investors or potential takeover candidates I believe it has to show profitability. It has to show they can make money. And to be honest, I think that is just around the corner.
Their hiring of new sales people will pay off. I know for a fact that this is starting to catch on. For heavens sake everyone reading this most know at least 5-10 people in their lives that are related to or work in the infrastructure sector. Ask them about it. And educate them about it. The sooner we get using this for our roads, the sooner your car repair bills will go down. Crappy unsafe roads and large car repair bills are a hot topic in the area that I live.