RE: Stockefeller ...I think your analysis of the "business" side of this play is spot on, Heavy. A couple of questions: couldn't we consider stockefeller input as part of the "business"-- like any post here potentially. However, it also seems odd to me that D put out this news release with this negative info in it. I am not used to cos disclosing info that is downbeat....unless it is in their interest to do so. That is to say, the bit in the safe harbor line about not being required to let shareholders know when forward looking statements do not materialize in the way they are forecast at the time of the M&A is widely relied upon by cos wishing to avoid "disappointing" their "supporters." So maybe D is just being scrupulously honest with their brudders? But sticking with the hard business line you've being drawing here.....just what is the good reason the cos could have to give us the real skinny on how difficult the business end of things is for them at the present time? Could that info been considered material and so obliged them to report it? Do we expect a microcap spec diamond play to be a model of good corporate citizenship? No. So why are they seeming to act like they are just that by disclosing info that is not all just sunbeams and rainbows and......lest I forget, bluesky? Interested to hear what you think. For myself I have tentative answer i) and other tentative answer ii). Neither of which I'm particularly happy about.