Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Dianor Resources Inc V.DOR



TSXV:DOR - Post by User

Comment by heavymonzyon Jan 09, 2012 11:28am
365 Views
Post# 19382084

RE: RE: Oldcrow Leadbetter ...

RE: RE: Oldcrow Leadbetter ...

If you disregard what Reguly asserted about company disclosure at the time and focus on the underlying argument ... it seems abundantly clear that Reguly was onto something with regards to the power/control/influence Oldcrows position would have on the project.

Reguly was speaking to a mine situation ... however ... looking at it years later ... it seems pretty clear that a large part of the hindrance in getting a JV deal of some sort done hinged on the enormous position Oldcrow retains.

The smaller part of that equation is the surface rights mortgage ... which is still left past due payment for Nov.30/2011 so far as we have been made aware. The larger part ... Reguly had pegged it ... we just didn't understand the pre-mine impact ... it is definitely a factor in the circumstances of a whole.

The problem right now ... you just don't know if Oldcrow gets ... or is ... ornery once again like last time out with the statement of claim being thrown down.

 

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>