Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Dianor Resources Inc V.DOR



TSXV:DOR - Post by User

Post by heavymonzyon Feb 27, 2012 9:29am
369 Views
Post# 19590100

Gmazerolle ...

Gmazerolle ...

...can you clarify? Did you write that you know Ryder is shaking the tree ... and if so ... what do you mean by that?

I think your criticism of my posts pale in comparison to the direct characterization you just made about Ryder considering it is in response to my statement regarding an insider shaking the tree as would be the indication by the TSX marker insider sales that have not been reported to Sedi to this point.

Do you see how characterizing my posts as 'bashing' doesn't even come close to touching the depths of negativity that your single post has done with so few words?

You mentioned something about a mirror earlier ... and that mirror looks truly 'foggy' ... I would agree.

As for EV meaning nothing Mcflyguy ... TEC had a 30 million dollar qualifier for minimum asset value being maintained ... and I don't believe it was based on EV ... and if that is correct ... then the EV being expressed in the info I referenced ... it's likely pretty close to the mark ... if not right on it.

Maybe you can clarify the TEC qualifier ... was that EV?

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>